In short answer is YES.

1. No clear business owner or decision

Many projects start with enthusiasm but fail to answer:

• What decision or workflow is AI improving?
• Who owns the outcome?

Without a business owner and success metric, AI remains a lab experiment.

---

2. Poor data readiness

AI stalls when:

• Data is inconsistent, incomplete, or poorly governed
• Key data is inaccessible (especially unstructured data)
• No data ownership or quality accountability exists

AI amplifies data problems—it doesn’t overcome them.

---

3. Over-ambitious scope

Common failure pattern:

• Trying to automate end-to-end processes too early
• Expecting autonomy instead of augmentation

Large, undefined scopes increase risk and slow delivery.

---

4. Governance and risk concerns emerge late

Projects often pause when:

• Security, privacy, or compliance teams engage too late
• Model explainability or auditability becomes a concern

Late-stage risk discovery kills momentum.

---

5. Organizational readiness gaps

AI introduces:

• Probabilistic outputs
• New operating models
• Cross-team dependencies

If teams expect deterministic behavior or lack AI literacy, adoption stalls.

---

6. No path to production

Many pilots fail to scale due to:

• Lack of MLOps / model lifecycle management
• No monitoring, retraining, or cost controls
• Unclear handoff from pilot to production teams

---

Pattern I see most often

AI projects don’t fail because the models don’t work—they stall because the organization isn’t ready to operationalize them.

---

In one line, “AI projects usually stall due to unclear business ownership, poor data readiness, over-scoped ambitions, and governance concerns surfacing too late—turning promising pilots into permanent experiments.”